On 5 April 2010 13:22, Christian PERRIER <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting Dmitrijs Ledkovs ([email protected]): >> Right fix for the Debian bug 576415 is LP 462169 >> >> + debian/rules, debian/samba.if-up: allow "NetworkManager" as a >> recognized address >> family... it's obviously /not/ an address family, but it's what gets >> sent when using NM, so we'll cope for now. (LP: #462169). Taken >> from karmic-proposed. >> >> The revision it was introduced in can be viewed here: >> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-branches/ubuntu/lucid/samba/lucid/revision/93 >> >> Or smaller diff at: >> >> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/karmic/samba/karmic-proposed/revision/85 > > Not all of this diff seems to be relevant for this bug but thanks > anyway. It indeed brings the needed /etc/network/if-up.d/samba file > and the mechanism to install it in debian/rules. >
I thought it has irrelevant things but I have no clue in samba packaging =) I haven't packaged a service/daemon ever yet before and I have no clue what the bug is about. I read your blog post on planet and applyed my launchpad-foo to narrow it down to one upload ;-) > At first glance, it seems that this fix is OK to be applied in the > Debian package (probably once we've confirmed that we don't go for > 3.5......now). > My packages are ok to freeze for squeeze, but my things are really small =) sorry not an expert to help release team or big packages. Good luck =) /me off to find something to do in debian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
