On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 13:05 +0100, Paul Martin wrote: > If utmp/wtmp are present and are being rotated, their replacements > should have the correct ownership and permissions. If they are not > present, then they will neither be created nor rotated. Anyway, but then it should be enough to use just "create" and not specifying the owner/mode again, right? This would avoid that logrotate sets other permissions, in case base-files should ever change them again.
Cheers, Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
