Hi again,

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 01:15:42PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:

The othe points certainly are handled. That's the reason this class have been outside of mainline cdbs for so long: I extended makefile.mk and autotools.mk to support multiflavored builds,

That's very cool on its own :) I'll see if we can use it from those normal packages that we build several times with different flags (e.g. gtk+2.0).

Please report back to this bugreport how it goes with using my multiflavor support in recent mainline cdbs.

If running into trouble then perhaps I van help :-)



Your implementation is quite exciting to look at. Parts of it I don't like - e.g. setting per-rule variables I feel should be avoided. But some parts are interesting - like bug#500118 which I did not know about. Obvious when you think about it, I just didn't until now :-P

You don't until you hit a bug ;) I was going to report a separate bug about it.

Ahem - please do file a separate bugreport: I have too much in my head at the moment so even if I did read up on it recently I have lost it again, and would appreciate if you could summarize in a separate bugreport.

Please do not report back to this bugreport on that issue but file a _separate_ bugreport - let's shrink this one to be about multiflavor support.



Another thing I haven't gotten around to play with is parallelised builds. In case you want a challenge ;-)

Doesn't CDBS support it already?

Yes, the infrastructure is there and is used for some (but not all possible) classes. It is just that _I_ haven't played with it so do not know if it works properly ;-)



Kind regards,

- Jonas

--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to