Package: sux
Version: 1.0.1-5
Severity: normal
The sux(1) man page says,
"""
'sux user' and 'sux - user' behave just like su but
transfer $DISPLAY and the X cookies.
"""
While one could, strenuously, interpret this to mean that
both 'sux user' and 'sux - user' should behave like 'su user',
I find the interpretation that sux should behave like su in
both cases (i.e. 'sux - user' should behave like
'su - user') much more intuitive and useful.
However, it seems the current version disagrees.
Thanks,
Shai.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-686 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
sux depends on no packages.
Versions of packages sux recommends:
ii xauth 1:1.0.4-1 X authentication utility
sux suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
