On 03/15/2010 01:15 AM, Chris Taylor wrote: > That does indeed appear to be the origin of the limit. Although sanely > dying, or notifying, when trying to open a socket with a longer file > name than 108 chars should be appropriate.
There appears to be a Warn2 logging message in the code already, so it
shows up when you supply a -d argument to socat.
Maybe this should be switched to an error message so that it shows by
default?
Or maybe it should be a fatal error? It seems potentially dangerous to
just push ahead with a truncated name, though. what if the truncated
name already exists and is in use for something else?
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
