On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 06:57:40PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > You have a separate -dev package too... If you were to only have a > static version of the library (which I would strongly discourage, fwiw, > regardless of what upstream says, but still), there is no reason to have > two packages, everything could and should be in the -dev.
I've changed this in SVN. Most of the magic happens in header files, the small static libraries are really just support for these. > Also, you moved the static libraries without adding a proper Replaces: > field, breaking all upgrades. I've made -dev replace the non-dev > I suggest dropping the libatomic-ops binary package, moving the .a's > back. You could add a replaces for people who managed to upgrade > regardless too. Al, can you check over and upload you have a chance. Thanks, -i
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
