On 2010-03-09 10:29 +0100, [email protected] wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 10:18 AM, VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN wrote:
>>
>>> Something along symlinks:malloc assert failed and a absolutely
>>> unreadable formula. Note that compiling the same tree with a level
>>> link less (I now have a symlink for /scratch were previously I had
>>> a real mounted fs was working.
>>
>> Note that if there is a malloc/free problem, using valgrind could
>> potentially highlight where in the debian version...
This might be useful, but it is you who has to do it since I suspect
that the problem is not easily reproducible by me or anyone else.
> Here is the alway reproducible error (assert)
>
> symlinks -r -d
> /home/ceva6380/scratch/sahtree1/sah/gwmiddleware/REL/2009-11-27_V3.29.0/cm4/fsn
>
>> /dev/null
> symlinks: malloc.c:3096: sYSMALLOc: Assertion `(old_top == (((mbinptr)
> (((char *) &((av)->bins[((1) - 1) * 2])) - __builtin_offsetof (struct
> malloc_chunk, fd)))) && old_size == 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size)
>>= (unsigned long)((((__builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk,
> fd_nextsize))+((2 * (sizeof(size_t))) - 1)) & ~((2 * (sizeof(size_t)))
> -
> 1))) && ((old_top)->size & 0x1) && ((unsigned long)old_end & pagemask)
> == 0)' failed.
> /bin/sh: line 1: 3824 Aborted symlinks -r -d
> /home/ceva6380/scratch/sahtree1/sah/gwmiddleware/REL/2009-11-27_V3.29.0/cm4/fsn
>
>> /dev/null
Can you please run an unstripped version of symlinks under GDB and get a
backtrace? Either rebuild the package with DEB_BUILD_OPTS=nostrip or
run the symlinks binary directly from the source tree. Please also
install the libc6-dbg package.
TIA,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
