Sorry, I was wrong.
I assumed, that the warning is concerning the subexpression (++i),
but if we remove the <99 comparison, then the warning disappears,
and hence the warning is concerning the unsused value of the coparison,
namely the value of the non-last member of the comma expression
is not used.
1: I suggest to lower the severity of this report #570838
2: I suggest to enhance the the warning string of the compiler to
something like this:
"value of the non-last member of the comma expression is not used"
Regards,
Peter PROHLE.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
