On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:39:52AM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:59:24AM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > > * Explicit dependency on gcc 4.3 removed (Closes: #533807) > > > but the changelog does not say what this explicit dep has been added... > > > > I would also suspect that this is a compiler related issue; for your > > modifications are only in the control file and changelog. I'll try to > > probe this further, and let you know. > > Upon further probing, I can confirm that if I switch the -O3's in > debian/rules to -O2, then things start working fine. I'll try to probe > further and see how to put the blame elsewhere (on the compiler, that > is).
OK, after wasting several hours on this, I couldn't really get to the root of the problem. The trouble is that zgesvd causes several lapack calls, each of which calls several lapack functions; it is very difficult to isolate which Blas function actually causes the error. Since SVD is something I consider very important, I would request you to please re-upload Blas with an optimization level of -O2, so that things remain sane with all the reverse dependencies. Thanks, and sorry. Kumar -- But what can you do with it? -- ubiquitous cry from Linux-user partner. (Submitted by Andy Pearce, [email protected])
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
