On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 15:54 -0800, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Dustin Kirkland wrote: > [...] > > > > We are carrying this patch in Ubuntu. We would appreciate Debian's > > consideration of merging it upstream. > > > > I just checked the 2.3.3 package that was accepted in lucid and don't see > it.
It's in the 2.3.3ubuntu2 version. > I don't think anything will be merged unless the concern about the ubuntu- > specific exclusion of some of the tests is also addressed. It would be even > better if ubuntu helped with the implementation of the 'lsb-header' > parameter to further reduce the divergence. The way this patch is implemented, I don't think that it's necessarily Ubuntu specific. It checks to see if the init.d/$script under examination is a symlink to /lib/init/upstart-job. If it is, then it skips the traditional LSB sysvinit style checks. :-Dustin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
