Package: recoll Version: 1.13.02-1 Severity: normal
Why does recoll depend (suggests) on xpdf? a) xpdf has a number of RC bugs, and is not actively maintained b) the recoll package description states that pdftotext is required to index pdfs, but there's anyway a suggests for poppler-utils, which contains that utility. Is there any advantage in having both? -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.33-rc7-lizzie Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages recoll depends on: ii libc6 2.10.2-5 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.4.3-2 GCC support library ii libqt4-qt3support 4:4.5.3-4 Qt 3 compatibility library for Qt ii libqtcore4 4:4.5.3-4 Qt 4 core module ii libqtgui4 4:4.5.3-4 Qt 4 GUI module ii libstdc++6 4.4.3-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.3.3-1 X11 client-side library ii libxapian15 1.0.17-1 Search engine library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3 compression library - runtime Versions of packages recoll recommends: ii aspell 0.60.6-3 GNU Aspell spell-checker ii python 2.5.4-9 An interactive high-level object-o Versions of packages recoll suggests: ii antiword 0.37-6 Converts MS Word files to text, PS pn catdoc <none> (no description available) ii ghostscript 8.70~dfsg-2.1 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF pn libimage-exiftool-perl <none> (no description available) ii poppler-utils 0.12.2-2.1 PDF utilitites (based on libpopple pn unrtf <none> (no description available) pn xpdf <none> (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
