Hello Jonathan, On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 19:29, Jonathan Freedman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Sandro, > > Thanks for the quick response !
you're welcome > I looked into this a bit today. pycurl is > licensed as dual lgpl/mit and openssl is an apache-style license. I believe > this makes it possible for them to be linked, however I am not a lawyer. I'm > not sure how Debian legal decisions are made. it would be nice if you can bring the question to [email protected] and ask their opinion. > For other projects I've been > involved with, I have asked a lawyer associated with one of my > organizations. Could you ask the advice of some of those lawyers also this time? the process to have a legal consult in Debian is quite long and costy, and we'd like to leave it to real serious matters. Any help in clarify the legality of pycurl -> openssl would be a great step forward. > The good news is that the workaround works fine. The bad news is that I keep > finding SSL accelerators that break gnutls :/ I understand your point, but having a legal issue on one side, I'd rather be on the other safe one. Regards, Sandro PS: please keep the bug in the loop, so anyone can read your replies. -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
