Hi Guys, On Monday 18 January 2010 10:39:29 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Mehdi Dogguy <me...@dogguy.org> writes: > >> This is a much more informative bugreport :) > >> I guess debhelper 7.1.0 fixed that. Can you confirm that? > > > > I can only confirm that stable debhelper doesn't work and > > testing/unstable (7.4.11) does. Even backports has debhelper 7.4.11 so > > I don't quite see the point in finding the exact version this was > > fixed. > > It's called « bug tracking ». It gives us the exact version to put in the > Depends field (or a conflicts with previous versions in our case).
I stumbled upon the same problem on backporting. From my point of view, user of you package don't have the track down the versioned build-dep of the packages. Anyways .... with debhelper 7.2.6~bpo50+1 the package is building well. With kind regards, Jan. -- Never write mail to <w...@spamfalle.info>, you have been warned! -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h---- r+++ y++++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
