On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 03:29:16PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Ana Guerrero dixit: > > >I have realized kwalletcli's debian/copyright is generated at build time. > >While > >this make the binaries packages have a proper copyright file, the source > >package does not have a complete debian/copyright file. > > The source package may not have a complete debian/copyright, but it > contains a proper licence anyway, and there are several other packages > doing the same, so I do not see a requirement to do so. > > Policy 2.3, 4.5 and 12.5 say /usr/share/doc/<package>/copyright is the > requirement, but source:debian/copyright is only a “should”. > So unless there is a really good reason, I’m tempted to WONTFIX this. >
Read my full email again, I am not telling you are violating any policy, and you are actually quoting me when I say the binaries are fine. Do not explain the policy as answer and try to understand the bug report: What I am asking you is being nicer following this "should" and I suggest you another solution. Answer why you do not like the solution. > However, I will not do so at the moment. There is discussion underways > whether this package will be taken over by pkg-kde, so it’ll be their > discussion by then. I’ll keep this bug open until that’s decided, one > way or the other. > You know I am there, do you? There is not such discussion, the point here is whether *you* want to maintain the package *in* the team with one or more co-maintainer and get help from the team from time to time, NO if *we* are taking over your package. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
