Um 16:15 Uhr am 06.01.10 schrieb Sven Hartge: >>> Next interesting find: If I recompile using -O0 (i.e. without any >>> optimization), haveged works fine. >> And again, using -O1 results in the following (different) backtrace. >> Maybe not a eglibc bug, but a bug inside haveged, which is know to be >> compiler dependant for its "magic". > Yes, using gcc-4.3 instead of gcc-4.4 "resolves" this bug.
I did a quick test with 4.5-20091226 from experimental and the segfault appears as well. Grüße, Sven. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
