On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 12:42:55PM +0100, Václav Ovsík wrote: > On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 11:19:19AM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > > We need a similar patch for libvirt - however it needs to be disto > > specific since different netcat versions have different needs - > > unforuntely. > > I'm not certain. Consider client running Fedora (without the patch) > connecting to server running Debian. I think it should be upstream if it > not disrupts other systems. > > Citation from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517778 > > = Comment #7 From Daniel Berrange 2009-08-19 11:06:04 EDT ------- > = > = virt-manager runs netcat on the remote end of the SSH connection. In theory > = closing the FD should cause netcat to see the EOF, and exit, causing SSH to > = exit. I reckon netcat is not behaving nicely though and thus holding open > the > = connection. The Debian netcat has certainly got such bugs, and Fedora one > has > = patched many bugs like that. We should explicitly kill() the SSH pid. > > This is probably about how should netcat behave and which implementations > (patches) are correct. I don't know. > I think adding `-q 0' for nc execution upstream should not hurt in either > case. > Cheers We had this in virt-manager an Cole dropped it since Fedora's nc didn't support -q0. -- Guido
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
