On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Simon Horman <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm quite happy to consider replacing openssl with GNUTLS. > Although I don't know if it would solve the problem at hand > nor how many bonus problems it might create.
My past experience is that converting from OpenSSL to GNUTLS is not THAT difficult, but maintaining a code base to support both via autoconf is quite painful. But I haven't done anything as intense as you in this regard. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/setsockopt.html The above URL documents how to use the SO_RCVTIMEO and SO_SNDTIMEO options of setsockopt(). http://74.125.153.132/search?q=cache:rEDEp2tvku8J:article.gmane.org/gmane.network.gnutls.general/227+GNUTLS_E_AGAIN+timeout&cd=9&hl=en&ct=clnk The above URL states that the way to set timeouts on the GNUTLS handshake (and presumably other GNUTLS library calls) is to use setsockopt(). I expect that you can use setsockopt() with OpenSSL too. While it's pretty stupid to not have a simple timeout parameter for a function call such as the ones we are discussing, it would be totally stupid to have no way at all of specifying a timeout other than SIGALRM. -- [email protected] http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Main Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
