On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 02:58:30PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 03:56:19PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > > I would point > > > > http://www.stanford.edu/~blp/avl/ > > > > as a much more complete (and supported?) AVL (et al.) implementation. > > I know of GNU AVL. However, nobody packaged it for Debian. Perhaps you want to > make an RFP out of this bug? I do not know of any software that uses GNU > libavl > though. >
I wonder if it is a better option for an AVL implementation in regards with that you packaged. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
