Hello On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 05:54:44PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello Ola, > > Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > > Restarting rebootmgr. > > Stopping the reboot manager > > Starting the reboot manager > > > > > >> Seems like you have upgraded from an earlier release. I do not think > >> the reboot manager is here still. > > Do you mean this reboot manager: > # ls /etc/init.d/rebootmgr -l > - -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1421 May 25 04:22 /etc/init.d/rebootmgr > > It exist in all of my other machines too.
Interesting. I have to check. It may be so that it still exist in sarge but has been removed from sid. It is possible. > >> Then you must have this file as a symlink... > > > >> zircone:~# ls -l /usr/lib/util-vserver/util-vserver-vars > >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4398 May 22 21:21 > >> /usr/lib/util-vserver/util-vserver-vars > >> It would be nice if you could check if the > >> /usr/lib/util-vserver/util-vserver-vars is a file or symlink. If it > >> points wrong we have the answer there. But if it don't we have some > >> other issue. Possibly with just the sarge version and I must get > >> an update into the stable relase. > > It is a normal file: > # ls -l /usr/lib/util-vserver/util-vserver-vars > - -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4200 May 25 04:22 > /usr/lib/util-vserver/util-vserver-vars Ok, thanks. > >> I can add backports to my own archive. That is not a problem but > >> users will not find it that easy. :) > > True, does any better way that other package maintainers do? Either make sure it get to unstable/testing or if it is really serious to stable. If we can debug this further and make good fix for it it may be possible to get it to stable as well. > I've looked at debian-policy, it mentioned: > > _stable_ > This is the current "released" version of Debian GNU/Linux. > Once the distribution is _stable_ only security fixes and other major > bug fixes are allowed. When changes are made to this distribution, the > release number is increased (for example: 2.2r1 becomes 2.2r2 then > 2.2r3, etc). > > Is this bug big enough for to put an fix into stable release? Possibly. But first we have to determine the exact cause of the failure. Because the file util-vserver-vars should NOT be in /etc... It was removed from there becuase it is changed to frequently (on every upgrade actually) and therefor it is not suitable to have there. I'll see if I can reproduce it at my server, but if you have time to debug it further that would be really great! Regards, // Ola > Regards, > > - -Andrew > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFC51ninQYz4bYlCYURAsM8AKDh+mlY/SxIc4awbLT5AV5u4DVAigCfWW1e > ufXg8XTNF1PzMqV+XrLm/8c= > =n92B > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
