Package: ifrename Version: 30~pre9-2 Severity: normal
Is there any specific reason why the ifrename udev rule uses 019-ifrename.rules for its name instead of the typical two-numbers schema? For more than 40 udev rules being present in /lib/udev/rules.d the only one that uses a three-numbers schema is the one ifrename. I'd like to see consistency regarding the numbering schema so it's obvious which script is executed in which order/state. Is there any chance that 019-ifrename.rules could be renamed to 19-ifrename.rules? thanks && regards, -mika- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
