Hi Patrick, On Montag, 7. Dezember 2009, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > Exactly. But I'm not talking about *purging* /ucf/, I'm talking about > removing ucf and purging a package that depends on ucf. I have a different > opinion (although it seems the majority of people think I'm confused ;) > about which package the registry data belongs to, therefore the conflict on > -devel. > > Regardless of that: If piuparts purges the depends the data goes away and > piuparts shouldn't complain. But it does, so it seems something is still > wrong.
Yes. Either in ucf or smstools it seems.
> > Thus closing this bug.
> Leaving it up to you to reopen the bug if appropriate.
Leaving it up to you to reopen+reassign the bug if appropriate ;-)
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
