On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:20:52PM +0300, Mikhail Lukyanchenko wrote: > Do you think it's ok that LICENSE file exists in trunk, but not in > released package?
Yes, that shouldn't be a problem. It's clear than the licence on the 2.3 release is intended to be BSD, so the change on trunk is clarifying, not relicensing. If 2.3 were under a non-DFSG-free licence, the situation would be different. > Please, take a look at license terms under `Files: debian/*`. Is it > correct to use term 'author' instead of full name? I'm still having > difficulties understanding legal subtleties. I think either should be OK. > > I'd suggest ensuring debian/copyright and debian/changelog end with a > > newline (I'm not aware of this being a requirement, but it's saner for text > > files to generally, and less likely to trip up tools which try to parse > > them). > > Done. Actually, copyright now ends with a line with a space but no newline! I tweaked that and have uploaded. It will need to go through the NEW queue which looks like it might take a week or two from the current backlog. You can monitor it here, though it hasn't appeared yet: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html I'm happy to sponsor future uploads, time allowing (though it's hardly a complex package, and is very quick to build). But I wouldn't be offended if you found someone else to sponsor, either temporarily or permanently. Cheers, Olly -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
