Hi there. Was busy (and previous package was working well, so I have no much motivation ;)).
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:47:06 +0200 Philippe Coval <r...@gna.org> wrote: > I saw your emails today, but i was busy > > Oh, I've found updated package on launchpad, I's quite ok, > even for debian ? or it does rely on ubufox ? > should it be renamed ? and break ubuntu compatibility ? I've rewrote it a little bit to follow DebMozExtTeam policy. I renamed it and set Conflicts with old one. Not sure, do we need to provide placeholder package (named flashblock) for easier upgrade of Ubuntu's installation. For me it looks like that's up to Ubuntu guys to do this in their distro. > > > except I > > dislike it's versioning strategy. > please explain,the odd versioning is in fact a consequence of upstream > management I mean version+snapshot. I believe, that it would be better to use upstream releases. > > > So we can base new version on it if > > you like and wanna continue to work on packaging it. > > > well what do you think about co-maintenance on alioth ? I set Debian MozExt Team as Maintainer, so feel free to join group on alioth. > but the main issue for me is to find some uploader for it; can you > help ? Sure. So I've uploaded package to NEW. And waiting for inclusion to alioth's group to create git repository there. -- Best regards, Alexander GQ Gerasiov Contacts: e-mail: g...@cs.msu.su Jabber: g...@jabber.ru Homepage: http://gq.net.ru ICQ: 7272757 PGP fingerprint: 04B5 9D90 DF7C C2AB CD49 BAEA CA87 E9E8 2AAC 33F1
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
