On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu> writes: > > >> > +/* Reported by Vitaly Kuznetsov <vi...@altlinux.ru> */ > >> > +UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x04e8, 0x5122, 0x0000, 0x9999, > >> > + "Samsung", > >> > + "YP-CP3", > >> > + US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL, > >> > + US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 | US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY | US_FL_FIX_CAPACITY | > > US_FL_BULK_IGNORE_TAG), > > > > This is highly questionable. How can you be sure all those flags are > > really needed? Have you collected a usbmon trace to find out what's > > actually going wrong? > > > > Alan Stern > > Hello Alan, > > as I answered Matthew Dharm yesterday this was not minimal set needed to > get device working properly.
> So, the minimum is US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64 | US_FL_BULK_IGNORE_TAG I would still like to see a usbmon trace showing what happens with US_FL_BULK_IGNORE_TAG and _without_ US_FL_MAX_SECTORS_64. Alan Stern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
