On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 04:33:35PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote: > Olivier Berger, 2009-10-21 14:48:26 +0200 : > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 05:32:32PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > >> severity 551761 wishlist > >> > > > > Care to elaborate on your severity change ? > > Note that it's "wishlist", not "wontfix". > > > If it's called fusionforge (and considering eventual trademark issues > > on GForge by the GForge group), the package should be named > > fusionforge, IMHO... hence a real bug... maybe even with greater > > severity than normal, as some policy should dictate a proper naming > > policy, I suppose. > > The package name is one element, but the description clearly describes > FusionForge, and this package is returned by searches on "fusionforge". > > I agree it's a problem that should be fixed. However, it's not a bug > in the technical sense, since the existing packaging more or less works. > The renaming will happen, though. It's just that we need to ensure > there's a working and stable transition path, and past experience (the > sourceforge → gforge rename) indicates that this transitioning is far > from trivial to get right. >
I'd suggest to add a Provides as a first step as in : http://bzr.debian.org/loggerhead/users/olberger-guest/fusionforge/revision/6148? Hope this helps. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
