On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 05:24:59AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 31 October 2009 at 04:49, Iustin Pop wrote: > | On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 07:08:43PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > > | > On 22 October 2009 at 10:09, Iustin Pop wrote: > | > | On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 03:53:11PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > | > > | > | > Package: libprotobuf-dev > | > | > Version: 2.1.0-1 > | > | > Severity: normal > | > | > > | > | > http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ has version 2.2.0 released on > August 11. > | > | > It would be nice if you could roll the package forward to this > version. > | > | > | > | Thanks, I knew about the release but have travelled a lot recently, > didn't have > | > | time to work on it. Will do so in a couple of weeks. > | > > | > Do you want help? I copied the debian/ directory from your 2.1.0-1 into a > | > 2.2.0 source tree and it builds fine. Adding > | > > | > usr/lib/pkgconfig/* > | > > | > to debian/libprotobuf-dev.install even adds the two new pkg-config files. > | > > | > Looks to be lintian-clean and fine from casual inspection. I can prepare > an > | > NMU if you want. > | > | Hmm, I don't think an NMU is a good idea since new versions of protobuf > | require a transition - last time I was bashed by release team for not > | doing things properly :) > | > | Anyway, I'll try to prepare the package this weeked (finally reached > | home!) and see how to sync-up with the transition; offer for help noted > | ;-) > > I would like to a NMU with a proper delayed upload in the next few days. > Is that ok with you? I plan on raising the library name libprotobuf5.
Yes please. Unfortunately I've been very busy lately, and will not be able to work on it for around two more weeks. But I'd recommend again talking with debian-release to make sure the library bump is coordinated. iustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
