On 11/11/09 at 11:23 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote: > > mpiexec and mpirun are the same even in MPICH2. mpiexec is required by > > the MPI standard, so all implementations provide it. mpirun is just kept > > around for backward compatibility since the MPI-1 days. > > I was not aware of that. So maybe using "mpiexec" as the master > alternative might be better/more intuitive?
I would vote for keeping it as is, so we don't need to change LAM and mpich. It's not really exposed to users anyway. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [email protected] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [email protected] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
