On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 09:19:32PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Artur R. Czechowski schrieb:
> > On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 05:34:15PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> >> I am closing it right now. rdepends does not show any package which
> >> still depends on the old libphysfs-1.0-0.
> > Please see a result of:
> Sorry, this is not testing/unstable, where the specific physfs version
> is available. You have to test it against testing/sid, where everything
> is fine.
Ok, I will wait 24 hours and check it again. Perhaps I just fetch
Packages.gz from not-yet-updated mirror.
Regardless of it, conception of testing/unstable vs. testing/sid
is confusing for me. Is it what you really want to write or is it
just a mistake?
Regards
Artur
--
Documentation is like sex: When it is good, it is very, very, good.
And when it is bad, it is better than nothing.
/Dick Brandon/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
