Hi! On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 02:56:44PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 17:33 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > Here you can plain see that password used by mount.cifs > > > simply _doesn't_ _match_. > > > > I'm not convinced that this bug is as simple as you suggest it is. IIRC, > > the [luser] -> [luser] in Samba logs is username and mapped username, not > > username and password,
Password in LOGS? 8-[ ] Of course, not, I was not implying this in any of my words. If I wasn't absolutely clear, please forgive my english -- I wrote bugreport in haste, 'cause I was rather busy at the moment. > Correct, we would not generally print the password in the logs, and in > the case of encrypted passwords, we simply can't. YES. Challenge-response there IIRC NT LM auth. > In any case, as the author of that line, I can assure you that this is > simply username and mapped username. What I was emphasizing there is *NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD* of course, not user mapping which I'm perfectly aware of. > Issues of parsing in mount on mount.cifs can be addressed by reading the > manpage and following the suggestions. Do you really think I did not do this? ;) In my report I cited all necessary actions to reproduce the bug -- by following those explanations you can see that I specified "luser,r' password at the password prompt, not through cmdline options. -- best regards, xrgtn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
