Hello, On trečiadienis 21 Spalis 2009 17:09:52 Marcos Marado wrote: > This seems to me to be the same bug reported upstream at > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195704 > > While they have it tagged as "wishlist" there, at least in Debian I don't > should be considered that way, since this is a regression regarding lenny's > Amarok package - in fact I think that this should be considered more severe > than it is at this moment.
Oh please, I know that all pet bugs seem critical but let's do not lose contact with reality here. You can call something a regression between Amarok 2.0 and 2.2, since 2.0 -> 2.2 is (or supposed to be) a linear evolution. On the contrary, Amarok 1 and Amarok 2 do not have even 10% in common, so it's revolution. Think of Amarok 2 as a new app compared to Amarok 1 and everything will become very clear to you. The package just happens to reuse the name since Amarok v1 is dead. What is more, regression itself does not justify high severity. Even if podcasts happen to be the most important thing for *you*, *many many* iPOD owners do not care about them at all. So this is a wishlist no matter how you look at it and current normal severity is already too high but I'm keeping it. FWIW, do you really believe Debian maintainer could (or should by that matter) fix such a bug? Package maintainers do not implement features, they integrate packages into distribution. Talking with upstream about this would be way more beneficial. -- Modestas Vainius <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
