Olivier Berger, 2009-10-21 14:48:26 +0200 :

> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 05:32:32PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> severity 551761 wishlist
>> 
>
> Care to elaborate on your severity change ?

Note that it's "wishlist", not "wontfix".

> If it's called fusionforge (and considering eventual trademark issues
> on GForge by the GForge group), the package should be named
> fusionforge, IMHO... hence a real bug... maybe even with greater
> severity than normal, as some policy should dictate a proper naming
> policy, I suppose.

  The package name is one element, but the description clearly describes
FusionForge, and this package is returned by searches on "fusionforge".

  I agree it's a problem that should be fixed.  However, it's not a bug
in the technical sense, since the existing packaging more or less works.
The renaming will happen, though.  It's just that we need to ensure
there's a working and stable transition path, and past experience (the
sourceforge → gforge rename) indicates that this transitioning is far
from trivial to get right.

Roland.
-- 
Roland Mas

... all in all it's just another rule in the firewall.
  -- Ping Flood



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to