also sprach Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> [2009.10.15.1444 +0200]: > P.S: I have to retract my statement wrt to mdadm. I double checked the Debian > mdadm udev rules files, and it uses the upstream udev rules file that calls > "mdadm --detail", whereas the dk-disks udev rule calls "mdadm --examine". The > former seems to operate on the actual md device only, the latter on the > underlying physical device. > So I don't think it's safe to remove the mdadm section from > 95-devkit-disks.rules just yet without further investigation. > I CCed the mdadm maintainers for their input. Maybe we could enable that > "mdadm > --examine" in mdadm itself?
I have no idea what you are talking about. What could be enabled in mdadm itself? A new bug report would be appreciated. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "men always want to be a woman's first love. women have a more subtle instinct: what they like is to be a man's last romance." -- oscar wilde
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
