On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:26:00 +0200
Ludovic Brenta <ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org> wrote:

> Neil Williams <codeh...@debian.org> writes:
> > Ludovic: now is the time to adopt gtk+extra2 and/or subsume it into
> > Ada. I don't think we can wait for upstream to do something in 8 months
> > time. Honestly, I don't think adoption is the right approach. Either
> > libgtkada subsumes the parts of gtk+extra2 that it needs into it's own
> > sources or libgtkada just has to get by without gtk+extra2 completely
> > *and quickly*. I really don't see any other option - there is no good
> > reason to keep gtk+extra2 around until Ada upstream can do something
> > about it in June 2010. gtk+extra2 needs to be gone before the end of
> > 2009, certainly long before any freezes begin for Squeeze.
> 
> I contacted the GtkAda upstream about this and they said GtkAda can get
> by without gtk+extra2; more importantly, the one package that depends on
> libgtkada2 does not need gtk+extra2 either.  So I agree with you; I will
> drop libgtkada2's dependency on gtk+extra2 so we can remove the package
> from Squeeze.

That's excellent news, thanks.

Feel free to either let me know when the upload happens or just file
the RM: RoQA bug for gtk+extra2 yourself once the dependency has gone.

The only other dependency is gpsim which has already been orphaned for
nearly 2 years and also appears to be dead upstream. gpsim source has a
--disable-gui option for ./configure to disable the GUI part of the
package which drops the gtk+extra2 dependency if someone really wants
to retain the gpsim CLI. I've pinged the people I could identify
as possibly interested in gpsim via #457486 and
gp...@packages.debian.org but there was no sign of interest in gpsim
from the two discussions on debian-devel this year. If nothing happens,
a removal request will need to be filed against gpsim at the same time
as the request to remove gtk +extra2.

-- 


Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/

Attachment: pgpOo1sVaVLjs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to