Francesco Poli wrote: > Nonetheless, the test was not completely error free. Indeed, some > worrying entries were logged to /var/log/kern.log: > > > [ 582.975686] Xorg:5396 conflicting memory types 90000000-95000000 > uncached-minus<->write-combining > [ 582.975700] reserve_memtype failed 0x90000000-0x95000000, track > uncached-minus, req uncached-minus > [ 643.989097] atunnel:5735 conflicting memory types 90000000-95000000 > uncached-minus<->write-combining > [ 643.989123] reserve_memtype failed 0x90000000-0x95000000, track > uncached-minus, req uncached-minus > [ 653.768420] atunnel:5737 conflicting memory types 90000000-95000000 > uncached-minus<->write-combining > [ 653.768446] reserve_memtype failed 0x90000000-0x95000000, track > uncached-minus, req uncached-minus > [ 686.813969] atunnel:5756 conflicting memory types 90000000-95000000 > uncached-minus<->write-combining > [ 686.813997] reserve_memtype failed 0x90000000-0x95000000, track > uncached-minus, req uncached-minus > > > As a consequence, I am *not* sure that the bug can be safely considered > as fixed... >
This looks like a kernel problem to me. It's probably the Xserver asking the kernel to set some memory range as WC but the kernel PAT code fails to do so for some reason, it sets UC- minus instead (things should be slower then). Which kernel are you using ? Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
