Sam, Kees, Given that upstream supports a syntax that does satisfy our needs, should we switch the recommendation to 'include' instead of '@include' after all, so we can deprecate @include and eventually drop one of the patches in our delta with upstream? The last time I spoke with upstream about this one, the conclusion was that only one syntax was needed and Debian should switch to the one upstream implements.
This would obviously be a long transition, since we will need to coordinate with all packages shipping /etc/pam.d/ files, but it would be straightforward... and I can't see any compelling reason to continue to use a syntax that differs from upstream's. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
