Hi,
The most recent version of this proposal was:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
--- virtual-package-names-list.txt~ 2009-03-15 18:19:17.000000000 +0000
+++ virtual-package-names-list.txt 2009-03-15 18:20:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -179,6 +179,17 @@
scheme-srfi-55 Scheme interpreter accepting the SRFI 55 language
extension
+Games and Game-related
+----------------------
+
+ doom-engine An executable Doom engine
+ boom-engine An executable Doom engine supporting the 'boom'
+ feature-set
+ doom-wad The data component of a Doom game, compatible with
+ the original Doom engine
+ boom-wad The data component of a Doom game, using features
+ from the "boom" engine family
+
Old and obsolete virtual package names
--------------------------------------
Note, that no other package then the ones listed here should use
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Can we have a show od seconds, please? Normally I would not ask
for a virtual package name proposal to go through a rounds of seconds,
but there was an extended discussion on this, and I want to be sure
that there is consensus that the issues raised have been addressed.
I would like to point out that these virtual names are already
being used in the wild by a small group of related packages.
manoj
--
"Your attitude determines your attitude." Zig Ziglar, self-improvement
doofus
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
