Dnia 2009-09-08, wto o godzinie 15:49 +0200, Robert Millan pisze: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:17:33PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote: > > > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2392/ > > > > Still works. > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:29:12PM +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote: > > > > I just tested 1.96+20090702-1 on T43. It works: > > Ok. Please test: > > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2440/ > > Remember that one should be very careful when doing these tests. A single > mistake can compromise the whole series and make us start over! > > So don't worry that others are testing the same thing. Duplicate checks > *are* helpful.
Ok. I rechecked 1.96+20090721-5 . I first purged grub-*, rm -rf /boot/grub, and reinstalled it from scratch, grub-install /dev/sd and update-grub. Now it works without problems, previously described issue with fonts isn't present here. grub.cfg is correct even in default configuration. grub automatically switches to gfxterm with proper fonts, and boots system without problem. So as stated previously We can test next package (or start bisection, without changeing grub.cfg). -- Witold Baryluk
signature.asc
Description: To jest część wiadomości podpisana cyfrowo
