Giuseppe Iuculano <[email protected]> writes:
> Yes, it should be. Could you compile the attacked chkutmp.c file please?
> gcc -o chkutmp-new chkutmp.c
Didn't help, but I put together an alternative patch, and would
appreciate it if you could apply it (and pass it upstream):
--- chkutmp.c~ 2009-08-22 18:00:20.000000000 -0400
+++ chkutmp.c 2009-08-22 18:14:11.000000000 -0400
@@ -113,6 +113,8 @@
s++;
for (x = 0; (*d++ = *s++) && x <= MAXLENGTH; x++) /* cmd
+ args */
;
+ if (d[-2] == '\n')
+ d[-2] = '\0';
i++;
curp++;
}
@@ -202,7 +204,7 @@
"CMD");
hdr_prntd = 1;
}
- printf("! %-9s %7d %-6s %s", ps_l[h].ps_user,
+ printf("! %-9s %7d %-6s %s\n", ps_l[h].ps_user,
ps_l[h].ps_pid, ps_l[h].ps_tty, ps_l[h].ps_args);
}
}
Thanks!
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [email protected] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
