On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:44:51PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:49:42 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > > > It seems clear to me that this package has to be removed, possibly in > > > > favour of libio-compress-perl if we want to keep that as a separate > > > > package (see #538214). > > However, a separate > > 2.020 is going to be obsoleted very soon by perl 5.10.1 so it might not > > be worth it before 2.021. > > But it would help us to get rid of the four other packages, which > would make things easier, no? I don't see much difference, the versioned reverse dependencies of those need to be changed in both cases or perl 5.10.1 will break them. As the libio-compress-perl package can be introduced without rendering the old packages uninstallable, I suppose it would make the transition a bit smoother (assuming it passes NEW before 5.10.1 gets in sid :) -- Niko Tyni [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
