On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 09:51:08PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 09:30:05PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Bastian Blank wrote: > > > I refuse to maintain the security-hog called qemu for the next stable > > > release, so it can only come from a different source package. > > What's your suggestion? What source package? Could the "normal" package > > "qemu" be used for the job, or is there too many patches? > > It should be built from the qemu source package eventually, but for now > its impossible due to the patches. > > > Should a > > different source package be built out of the the xen-3.4.0.tar.gz just > > for qemu? > > This should be a possible solution for now. >
Was there progress on this? > > While I understand that you don't want to maintain it (and you are > > giving a good reason for it), a big number of users will still need HVM > > support in Xen, and wont understand why Debian doesn't do it. > > Sure, but I don't even have a machine were I can test this. My only > machine with VMX is my notebook, which does not work with current Xen. > > > A solution > > has to be found, and it's unclear what you are suggesting here. > > Sure. But I'm currently seeing a change in the attitude of the user > crowd. Bugs exists always, but I only started to get insulted by bug > reporters because I do things different then they think it should be > done. > I'm sorry if I insulted you, or others. That was not the point. -- Pasi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
