On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 09:01:39PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Thanks for this. Interesting. When I originally went through sorting out
> the 2 server workaround for this, I considered (and rejected :)) this
> approach.
> 
> The problem with it is that apt-cacher was designed to ignore the server
> path so that .debs from different servers were deemed identical. This is
> useful for people who use the path_map hopping to provide server
> redundancy. This approach will break that.
> 
> I am happy to consider it again, but you need to convince me that it is
> better than the multiple instance way of doing it.

Lying awake considering this more overnight, I realised this would also
break checksumming which only uses the filename without a path.

Also, we would need to consider to which distro we assign existing files
which don't have the complete path prepended.

I am not rejecting this outright, but I think it is more complicated
than at first sight.

Mark



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to