Frans Pop <elen...@planet.nl> writes:
> Hi Goswin,
>
> I have a question about this bug report. It's not 100% clear to me what
> the intended working of the pdiff option is.
>
>> > I don't think that's the problem, since I was already using the
>> > --pdiff=mirror option (see my previous mail).
>>
>> Right you are. Just found another bug then. Somwhere some "if"
>> statement must have been lost or forgotten and --pdiff=mirror just
>> doesn't work as promised. It still uses the pdiff files. You have to
>> use --pdiff=none to actualy work around the problem.
>
> The man page says:
> --pdiff=use|mirror|none
> If the Release file contains entries for pdiff files then debmirror
> will attempt to update the Packages and Sources files with them but will
> not include them in the mirror. This is the default âuseâ behavior and
> avoids having time consuming pdiff files for a fast local mirror. Specâ
> ifying --pdiff=mirror will include the downloaded pdiff files in the
> mirror while specifying --pdiff=none will completely ignore pdiff files.
>
> From your comments in this BR it seems the intention is:
> - use: use to update Packages/Sources but don't include on mirror
> - mirror: include on mirror but do *not* use to update Packages/Sources
> - none: ignore them completely
>
> However, it seems more logical to me to have:
> - use: use only to update Packages/Sources but don't include on mirror
> - mirror: include on mirror but *and* use to update Packages/Sources
> - none: ignore them completely
>
> And IIUC that is exactly how it currently works.
Reading the man page I believe that is actualy what I ment and my
comments in the BR are wrong. --pdiff=mirror would include use.
> IMO the first set of definitions only makes sense if there was also an
> option "full" or "both" or something like that.
>
> I'd appreciate your input.
>
> Cheers,
> FJP
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
