tag 534474 +fixed-upstream thanks On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:28:17PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > The issue is reproducible for me with upstream mercurial HEAD using the > reproducer I provided previously, but not with revision fa4990c5b5c6 (which > corresponds to mutt-1.5.18). Bisection leads to the following result: > The first bad revision is: > changeset: 5827:776ef9dbe4d2 > branch: HEAD > user: Rocco Rutte <[email protected]> > date: Fri May 29 21:24:29 2009 +0200 > summary: Add flags to mutt_read_line() for EOL-stripping and > continuation support > --
Hi, sorry for getting back to you so late but I was on holidays for three weeks in July and then I had to catch up with work-related stuff, now I'm catching up with the mutt bts queue. I've tested ths and I was able to reproduce it, thanks for your clear explanation; I've tested this with the latest tip from upstream and it seems fixed, I'm now tracking back the commit to see what fixed this so we can include it to our patched version of mutt. I will let you know ASAP Cheers Antonio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
