Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Those interested in file-rc should check out BTS reports #539591
> (convert file-rc to order based on dependency information) and #539609
> (reguest for adotion from the file-rc maintainer). Someone need to
> work on file-rc for it to continue as a working solution in Debian.
> Mentioning it here in the hope that someone will step up.
>
> The sysv-rc and insserv packages will in the next upload be adjusted
> to let another package to take over update-rc.d, but any replacement
> need to order scripts the same way - using dependency information.
*NEED*?
This is utter bullshit. Please point me to a line in policy where we require
that a sysv-rc replacement needs to do a dependency based boot.This is your
idea, I can't find any place where it was discussed and accepted by the Debian
community. As long as there is no consensus regarding a dependency based boot,
*YOU* have to ensure that the insserv mess does not break people's systems.
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
