Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Sven Joachim dixit: > >> Do you have an idea how to implement that? Managing /bin/sh through the >> alternatives system does not seem very prudent. > > No, diversions are fine for that, I'd think. But I'm not a > debconf expert.
I thought Guillem was going to talk to you to see what the best way was to make sure mksh could provide /bin/sh (I've put him in Cc). Guillem: do you think the only sane way out is to not have bash ship /bin/sh? If so, how would bash preferably be adapted? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
