On Aug/10, Ben Finney wrote: > The above file doesn't seem to be part of the distribution of > org-mode. We should best rely on a grant of license given within the > work itself, rather than an independently-changeable document at a > URL. > > Probably the best way to do that is to include the above file in the > source package somehow. If you could convince the upstream maintainer > to make that file a standard part of the source distribution that > would be simpler.
I've tried, but the upstream author aims at reducing friction with the emacs development community, which in its wide majority refuses to dual-license under GPL+GDFL, instead thinking Debian should revisit its position and allow GFDL-licensed items to be packaged. Nothing new here, I'm merely hinting that the inclusion of this dual-licensed documentation in the upstream source package is quite unlikely :) I will apply your patch, and then I believe we can close this bug ? Cheers, and again thanks a lot for the clarification (especially under the form of a patch, heh), --Seb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
