reopen 540526
thanks
Hi Matthias,
sorry for reopening it but I think Sylvain request is a valid one.
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 05:48:08PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> please don't misuse the bts as a faq. the answer is in the build
> dependencies. that's enough documentation.
Debian Policy, at ยง12.5. Copyright information states:
Packages in the _contrib_ or _non-free_ archive areas should state in
the copyright file that the package is not part of the Debian
GNU/Linux distribution and briefly explain why.
So, even if it's a "should" I think it's worth fixing. Going trhough
all the (build-)depends and search which one is the culprit is a
little boring while the fix it's just
debian/copyright:
This package is in contrib because latex2html is in non-free and we
relay on it to build documentation.
Please consider include this statement (or another form you prefer) in
the next upload for that package.
>
> On 08.08.2009 18:09, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
>> Package: python2.5-doc
>> Version: 2.5.4-1
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I can't find the reason why python2.5-doc is in contrib. In particular it
>> doesn't seem to have non-free dependencies.
>> Please write a rationale about that so people can understand what is the
>> problem and if it can be fixed.
>
>
>
Thanks for considering,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
