Hi.
Is this considered as a wontfix-bug in the meantime?
I'd be very interested in a solution,... even the services.d/ sounds
not so unreasonable to me.
It would allow packages to ship their own files which would give us
even some sort of stupid conflict resolution if more packages use the
same port-number for different protocols.
(Users could use the alternatives mechanism e.g.)
I also think that a services.d/ solution wouldn't be that overkill,..
I'm running a very large storage element cluster, part of the
worldwide LHC Computing Grid, and we have quite a few portnumbers from
different programs or even big portranges, where it would be nice to
see the right names in the tools using /etc/services.
Best wishes,
Chris.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
