reassign 538379 chkconfig thanks [Peter Eisentraut] > Since you have now added the "service" program (thanks), I was > wondering how to proceed with my chkconfig package. Would you also > be interested in adding a chkconfig program? I think this would be > pretty useful, and it is widely known from other Linux > distributions. Since we have LSB headers and insserv support, > chkconfig makes sense now. > > I can do the legwork if you want.
Well, the plans for the service program is to extend it to work with both sysv-rc and upstart. I do not really believe it make sense to do the same for chkconfig. Because of this, I believe it make most sense for you to change the chkconfig package to drop the service command and keep the chkconfig program in that package. I assume you mean that chkconfig make less sense now with LSB headers and insserv, as it need to change behaviour when enabling and disabling services. Perhaps it should be using the service command as its backend? Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
