On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 07:44:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 07:07:54PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:23:08AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:05:48PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:03:47PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > Damn #490173. > > > > > > Supposedly, it is fixed in gcc 4.4. Would you mind checking? > > > > > At least the testcase is. I'll test if xulrunner will build > > > with gcc-4.4 packages. > > > > Indeed, xulrunner built fine with correct symbols when using > > gcc-4.4/g++-4.4. > > I'll try to add something to implement a workaround with gcc-4.3.
Would you mind giving a try to the attached patch? Supposedly, it should do the right thing, though I couldn't test it for obvious reasons. Cheers, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
